La teoria del complotto ora ha un rapporto accademico a sostegno. E’ stato pubblicato da Europhysics News e mette in dubbio la spiegazione ufficiale del crollo di tutti e tre gli edifici del World Trade Center l’11 settembre 2001.
Ma l’avranno scritto i pentastellati? Dopo le “scie chimiche” un altro “gomblotto”!!!
“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST [U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology] reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.”
L’indagine è stata condotta da Steven Jones, ex professore emerito di ingegneria civile presso la McMaster University in Ontario, Canada e membro della Canadian Society for Civil Engineering e Istituto di ingegneria del Canada; Anthony Szamboti, ingegnere progettista meccanico; e Ted Walter, autore di Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s Beyond Misinformation: “What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7.”
Qui se siete interessati a leggere le osservazioni presentat dai ricercatori
//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});